MeetEdgar (often simply called Edgar) is a social‑media management platform that launched in 2014. It's safe to say that Meetedgar is one of the oldest social media management platforms out there.
It was created to help small business owners, bloggers, and freelancers save time on social posting by building an evergreen content library and recycling posts automatically.
Evergreen content library becomes the unique value proposition for MeetEdgar as it gave an advantage over the competition at that time. The feature lets you store every post you create and then reshare it on a recurring schedule.
MeetEdgar Pricing
The MeetEdgar pricing is unique overall, almost all the other players in the social media management space.
Unlike most social media tools offer at least 3 pricing options, and sometimes up to 6, MeetEdgar only offers 2 pricing options. That's it. Two options, pick one that suits you.
- $ 29.99/month for freelancers and entrepreneurs
- $49.99/month for small businesses & social media teams
With a starting point close to $30 a month, the pricing can feel a little high for freelancers and small businesses.
How MeetEdgar Scores on Review Platforms
Software Advice
MeetEdgar holds an overall rating of 4.6/5 on Software Advice.
Breakdown: ease of use 4.4, customer support 4.6, value for money 4.1, and functionality 4.4.
Users praise the automated post recycling, but many mention pricing as a downside. Reviewers specifically said things like “There should be more price options” and “the pricing should be lower for beginners.”
Trustpilot
On Trustpilot, MeetEdgar has a TrustScore of around 3.2/5 from 16 reviews.
Most 1-star comments mention high cost and account stability issues.
One long-time customer said the $49.99/month price was too much and complained that their social accounts “always disconnected,” which pushed them to look for alternatives.
G2
MeetEdgar scores 4.3/5 on G2 with roughly 57 reviews.
It performs very well in content organization — 9.7/10 for its content calendar and 9.8/10 for its content library.
However, its social analytics score is lower (7.4/10), and reviewers mention that the reporting features are not as deep as what competitors offer.
Why MeetEdgar Users Look for Alternatives
MeetEdgar’s automation is powerful, but many users search for other tools when they hit these deal‑breakers.
1. Pricing feels high for small teams
Many reviewers mention price as their biggest frustration. Several users say the pricing options are limited and that there should be more affordable tiers.
Others note that the cost is too high for beginners, and some even describe Edgar as “super pricey" and don’t offer in-app conversation management.
These comments suggest that the $29–$49 per-month plans feel out of reach for many solopreneurs.
Even though MeetEdgar offers a 30-day free trial, users still feel uncomfortable with the pricing strategy.
2. Limited support for modern and emerging social platforms
Another growing complaint is that MeetEdgar hasn’t kept up with newer social networks. While many creators and brands are expanding to platforms like Bluesky, Mastodon, and Telegram, MeetEdgar still focuses mainly on the traditional platforms.
Users who now manage multi-platform audiences say this creates unnecessary manual work, since they still have to publish or engage on newer channels outside the tool.
3. Shallow analytics and few integrations
Comparisons with other tools show that although MeetEdgar performs well in content automation, its analytics capabilities lag behind competitors.
Reviewers say the reporting is good but far from deep or detailed, especially for users who rely heavily on data. For people who need advanced reporting or broader platform support, MeetEdgar may feel too limited.
3 Strong MeetEdgar Alternatives for 2025
1. Nuelink – automation with broader channel support
Why it’s better:
Nuelink is a comprehensive automation tool that goes beyond simple queue-based reposting. Nuelink supports e-commerce platforms like Shopify and Etsy, podcast platforms such as Spotify and Captivate, and blogging platforms like Ghost and Medium. Allowing users to automate posting across all of these channels.
Users can set one-time automatic sharing rules so that when a new blog post or product listing, or podcast goes live, Nuelink detects it and shares it to multiple social channels with unique AI-generated captions and hashtags.
Pricing starts at $18 per month for individuals and goes up to $49 for businesses, with a 14-day free trial included.
For agencies, features like client workspaces and team permissions make collaboration easier.
Compared with MeetEdgar’s focus on evergreen recycling, Nuelink’s cross-platform automation, collections for organizing posts, and built-in link-shortening/analytics offer a far more better experience.
2. SocialBee – rich collaboration and more channels
Why it’s better:
SocialBee markets itself as a more feature-rich alternative to MeetEdgar. Its collaboration tools allow teams to assign roles, add notes, and approve posts before publishing. Unlike MeetEdgar, SocialBee also includes an integrated social inbox for managing DMs, comments and mentions across multiple networks.
The platform supports direct posting to YouTube and Bluesky and offers Universal Posting for Reddit, Facebook Groups, and many other platforms. Users also benefit from unlimited AI credits, PDF-exportable analytics, and suggested posting times. These advanced features make SocialBee ideal for teams that need full-suite management and reporting tools, not just evergreen scheduling.
3. Buffer – simple and affordable with AI assistance
Why it’s better:
Buffer is known for its ease of use and budget-friendly pricing, making it a popular choice among startups. Comparisons often note that Buffer’s interface is clean and straightforward, with integrations for Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Pinterest, and Facebook.
It includes AI-powered tools for post ideas, captions and hashtags, helping users stay creative. Pricing starts at $5 per social profile per month, and the platform includes advanced scheduling options, analytics, and team collaboration capabilities.
While Buffer doesn’t offer MeetEdgar’s deep content recycling, it provides stronger analytics and is easier for new users to learn. For anyone prioritizing simple scheduling, multi-platform support, and affordability, Buffer remains a solid alternative.
Conclusion
MeetEdgar pioneered the concept of evergreen content automation and remains popular among solopreneurs and small businesses thanks to its intuitive category‑based scheduling and unlimited content library.
However, the combination of higher pricing, limited collaboration, and shallow analytics has led many users to seek out alternatives like Nuelink, Buffer, and SocialBee.
